Fantastic. I really appreciate your linking to these resources, on top of your already extremely helpful collation of sources at academia.edu. The question for me, if we're not afraid of Neochalceonianism, is how to bring the Church of the East as well, which was never flatly "Nestorian," in fact they considered him a figure who was not necessarily representative of their tradition. With the critical editions now complete, https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-luminous-way-to-the-east-9780197609644 do you know of anyone doing work to bring their fascinating mystical texts, some of the deepest I'm aware of anywhere, into the orbit of these conversations as well?
I'd talk to Nathan Tilley, who graduated from Duke (teaches at CUA currently?) and works on Babai the Great. He's up on the whole Neochalcedonianism thing too.
Fantastic. I really appreciate your linking to these resources, on top of your already extremely helpful collation of sources at academia.edu. The question for me, if we're not afraid of Neochalceonianism, is how to bring the Church of the East as well, which was never flatly "Nestorian," in fact they considered him a figure who was not necessarily representative of their tradition. With the critical editions now complete, https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-luminous-way-to-the-east-9780197609644 do you know of anyone doing work to bring their fascinating mystical texts, some of the deepest I'm aware of anywhere, into the orbit of these conversations as well?
I'd talk to Nathan Tilley, who graduated from Duke (teaches at CUA currently?) and works on Babai the Great. He's up on the whole Neochalcedonianism thing too.
Thanks! No pressure, but anything you report back will be received with interest.